Upload your existing comp plan. We structure the rules and calculate one example payout, back in your inbox within a business day.
Free. No signup. Reviewed by a human before it lands in your inbox.
Tiered percentage plan with quota accelerator
| Attainment | Rate | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| 0 to 79% | 4.0% | Closed won revenue |
| 80 to 99% | 6.0% | Closed won revenue |
| 100% and above | 9.0% | Revenue above quota |
Flagged, not guessed: your plan mentions a clawback on refunded deals within 60 days. PayoutPilot does not handle clawbacks yet, so it is excluded from this calculation rather than approximated.
A sample scan on an example tiered plan. Yours is built from your own document.
Nothing breaks loudly. The cost shows up as a bill that grows with headcount, a reconciliation that eats a day a month, and a payout conversation you have to defend from memory.
Per-seat commission tools charge you again for every rep you add. Sales Cookie states it plainly on their own billing page: pay more when you add reps. The tool gets more expensive precisely when the team is working.
One spreadsheet, one owner, and everyone else hoping there is no mistake in it. The reconciliation is the part nobody has time for, and it arrives every single period.
When a rep cannot see how their payout was calculated, the conversation stops being about the number and starts being about trust. That is an expensive conversation to have at month end.
“I did the math and realized I wasted 216 hours manually tracking my commissions”
Your comp plan's rates, tiers, and quota rules, structured and laid out clearly.
Exactly what a rep would be paid under your plan, calculated line by line, so you can check it against your own numbers.
A plain-English flag of any plan mechanics we could not confidently parse, so nothing is guessed.
A look at what PayoutPilot costs at your headcount: one flat number, not per-seat math.
Delivered to your inbox within 4 hours during business hours, by end of next business day if submitted overnight.
Your PayoutPilot comp plan scan is ready
from Dario at PayoutPilot
Hi Priya,
Here is your comp plan scan. Attached you will find:
Check it against your own numbers. If something looks off, reply and tell me, that is useful information either way.
comp-plan-scan.pdf
Structured plan, worked example, flags
An example of the delivery email, addressed to a made-up recipient.
PDF, spreadsheet, or plan doc, whatever you already have on hand.
A human reviews the parsed rules for anything ambiguous before anything is sent back.
Check it against your own numbers, no commitment and no call required.
If the scan looks right, we can talk about keeping it running automatically with PayoutPilot: one flat price whatever your headcount, no charge for plan changes. PayoutPilot's current version handles flat and tiered percentage plans, quota attainment with accelerators, and per-rep quotas. It does not yet handle clawbacks, draws, true-ups, or multi-currency plans. We will tell you plainly if your plan needs one of those, rather than guessing.
PayoutPilot is not the cheapest way to track commissions. A spreadsheet is free. It is the option whose bill does not rise every time you hire.
Every other tool on this page except PayMyReps bills you per seat, so the bill moves every time you hire. PayoutPilot is $129/mo flat up to 15 reps and $179/mo for 16 to 25. Hire your eleventh rep and the number does not change.
You upload the comp plan document you already have and confirm the parsed rules yourself. There is no implementation project to schedule and no training invoice, which is what QCommission charges $500 to $2,000 for and what QuotaPath publishes a 45 to 60 day window for.
Three of the four tools above cannot tell a 12-rep buyer what they will pay without a sales conversation first. The number is on this page. So is the list of what PayoutPilot does not do.
Published pricing, read off each vendor's own live pricing page on 16 July 2026.
| Product | Model | At 15 reps | Setup | Self-serve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PayoutPilot | Flat, per company | $129/mo | $0 | Yes |
| QCommission | Per user | $225 to $375 | About $1,000, plus $500 to $2,000 training | No, demo only |
| PayMyReps | Flat | About $440 to $470 | $0 | Yes |
| Sales Cookie | Per user (payees plus admins) | About $640 | $0, first plan configured free | Yes |
| QuotaPath Growth | Per user, plus platform fee | About $910 | Included, 45 to 60 days | Trial |
QCommission publishes no public pricing (their pricing is behind a contact form), so their figures come from third-party software listings rather than their own site. PayMyReps prices in pounds (£349), shown here converted for comparison. Sales Cookie and PayMyReps charge no setup fee either, and Sales Cookie configures your first plan free: on setup cost, the honest gap is with QCommission and QuotaPath, not with them.
PayoutPilot has no customers yet, so it has no testimonials, and inventing some would be a strange way to start a product that calculates your team's pay. These are real, public quotes from Reddit and review sites, from people talking about this category and the tools already in it. None of them are PayoutPilot users. They are the reason it is being built.
We have a terrible time trying to track team commissions on Excel. I explored some Salesforce apps but turns out they aren’t as simple to implement.
Frontline manager here, 12 AEs reporting to me. I spend way too much time pulling reports from Salesforce to figure out where each rep stands against quota. Our ops team is two people and already stretched thin so whatever we bring in needs to be low maintenance.
Minimum of 10 users makes it quite expensive for a small business
One must be very computer/software savvy to use this program as it is not very user friendly, is extremely fastidious with how data must be entered. Had to analyze and design all my own checks and balances, and have reports custom built to meet my requirements (custom reports require an extra charge $).
File upload gives me control. I trust a CSV I’ve validated way more than a live feed that broke because someone changed a field name.
The same research turned up practitioners arguing that a well-built spreadsheet is fine below roughly 15 to 40 reps. They have a point. If your plan is simple and your spreadsheet is not hurting, the scan will tell you that too, and you should keep your money.
Solo software builder who personally reads and checks every comp plan before anything goes live
I build small, focused tools instead of hiring a team, which means I personally read your comp plan and check the numbers before anything reaches your inbox. No support queue, no outsourced parsing, just one person paying close attention to your specific plan.
Your plan document is emailed straight to the founder and is not stored on this site. Because every scan is read by one person, the queue is finite: scans go out in the order they arrive.
This scan shows what your plan looks like today. PayoutPilot keeps it running automatically every pay period, so you never have to rebuild this by hand again, and your price stays flat as your team grows.
If PayoutPilot's calculated commissions for your first live pay period do not match your own manually verified numbers, you do not pay for that period, full refund, no questions, and we help you export your data back out.
One flat price per company
Up to 15 reps
16 to 25 reps
No setup charge and no per-seat fees. The number does not move when you hire.
Book a founder callStart with your free scanThis is the honest scope boundary, and it matters more than any feature list. PayoutPilot's current version handles flat percentage plans, tiered percentage plans, quota attainment with accelerators, and per-rep quotas. It does not handle clawbacks, draws, true-ups, or multi-currency plans. If your plan needs one of those, the scan will say so plainly and you should buy something else. We will tell you which.
It is free and there is no card, no signup, and no call required. The catch, if you want to call it that, is that we hope the scan is good enough that you ask what it costs to keep it running. If it is not, you keep the scan anyway.
Yes. The parse is AI-assisted, then read line by line by the founder before anything is sent. That is why it takes hours rather than seconds. Anything ambiguous is flagged rather than guessed, because a confidently wrong commission number is worse than the spreadsheet it replaces.
It is emailed to the founder to produce your scan and is not stored on this site or in a database. It is not shared with anyone else and it is not used to train anything.
Not from the vendor directly, and it would be dishonest to claim otherwise: those tools export results, not plan definitions. What you upload is your comp plan document, the PDF, spreadsheet, or doc that describes the rules. That is what gets structured.
Then keep it. Practitioners in the same public threads we quote above argue that a well-built spreadsheet holds up below roughly 15 to 40 reps, and they are not wrong. PayoutPilot is worth money when the per-seat bill or the monthly reconciliation has become the problem, not before.
Because it does less and because it is built by one person with no sales team to fund. The price is flat per company rather than per seat, which is a structural choice rather than a discount: it means the bill does not rise when you hire.
The Calculation Match Guarantee: if the calculated commissions for your first live pay period do not match your own manually verified numbers, you do not pay for that period, you get a full refund, and we help you export your data.